WTF I Can’t Believe I’m Writing This: 1,500 Troops on Standby for Minneapolis
God Help Us This Is Not A Drill
Listen to what I’m saying. The Pentagon is putting 1,500 soldiers of the Army’s 11th Airborne Division on standby for possible deployment to Minneapolis, and the Insurrection Act is now being openly discussed.
Key Developments
Active Duty Soldiers on Standby: The Pentagon has ordered roughly 1,500 active duty soldiers from the U.S. Army’s 11th Airborne Division to “prepare to deploy” to Minnesota, amid unrest in Minneapolis. [1]
Trump’s Insurrection Act Threat: President Donald Trump has threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act, a rarely used 1807 law, to deploy the U.S. military and quell the Minneapolis unrest if local authorities “don’t obey the law” and stop the protests. [1]
Official Responses: The White House said it is routine for the military to prepare contingency forces “for any decision the President may or may not make,” while defense officials have framed the alert as contingency planning rather than a deployment order. [2]
National Guard vs. Active Duty: Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz has mobilized the Minnesota National Guard to support local police, with reporting indicating Guard forces have not been deployed to the streets. Invoking the Insurrection Act could federalize the National Guard or add active duty forces alongside them, creating unusual command and legal overlap. [3]
Legal and Historical Context: The Insurrection Act allows the President to deploy U.S. military forces domestically or federalize state Guard units to suppress “insurrection” or “unlawful” civil unrest, functioning as an exception to Posse Comitatus limits. It has not been invoked since 1992, and modern use without a governor’s consent would be extraordinary. [5]
State and Local Backlash: Minnesota leaders are fiercely opposing any federal military intervention, and state officials have pursued legal action over the federal crackdown, with repeated warnings that troop deployment would be challenged in court. [2]
Partisan Divide in Washington: Trump’s posture is polarizing, with Democratic lawmakers warning against domestic militarization and Republican allies defending federal intervention if Minnesota officials cannot restore order. [7]
Public Reaction and Risk of Escalation: Critics fear troops could inflame tensions rather than calm them, while supporters argue it could restore order. Analysts warn the risk of miscalculation rises when combat trained forces enter ambiguous crowd control environments, with serious implications for civil liberties and civil military norms. [5]
Context: Unrest in Minneapolis: The deployment threat follows turmoil in the Twin Cities after the fatal shooting of Renee Good by an ICE agent on January 7 and continuing protests tied to the federal immigration surge described as “Operation Metro Surge.” [6]
If The Threat Turns Into Orders
Minnesota is on edge as the Pentagon readies active duty Army troops for possible deployment to Minneapolis, a drastic step that would invoke a law last used during the 1992 Los Angeles riots. About 1,500 soldiers from the 11th Airborne Division have been ordered to prepare for potential deployment to Minnesota, with officials emphasizing the move is contingency planning and that no final decision has been made. [1]
The trigger for this planning is the unrest in Minneapolis. The city has been roiled by protests against a massive federal immigration crackdown that intensified after an ICE agent shot and killed Renee Good on Jan. 7, followed by continuing demonstrations and confrontations around federal operations. [6]
Against that backdrop, Trump has threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act, arguing Minnesota officials must stop violence targeting immigration personnel or face federal intervention. Minnesota officials, including Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, have condemned the threat and emphasized local authority over public safety. [2]
Walz has mobilized the Minnesota National Guard for readiness, but reporting indicates Guard forces have not been deployed into street operations. That detail matters because it signals an effort to demonstrate control under state authority while avoiding conditions that could be used to justify federal takeover of the response. [3]
If the Insurrection Act is invoked, consequences could be immediate. The federal government could expand command authority, potentially federalize Guard forces, and claim a legal mandate to deploy military power to restore order. Supporters call this a necessary last resort, while critics argue it risks blurring the line between restoring order and suppressing dissent. [5]
Probable outcomes diverge dramatically depending on whether Trump follows through. A deployment could trigger rapid litigation, intensify street tensions driven by crowd psychology in response to military presence, and become a national flashpoint over civil liberties and civil military relations. Even without deployment, the stand by posture itself can shift public behavior by signaling the federal government is preparing for a worst case scenario. [5]
At this moment, the situation remains fluid. The key variables are whether federal authorities issue movement orders, whether violence spikes, whether courts limit or reshape the federal operational footprint, and whether state and local officials can keep public order without giving Washington a pretext to escalate further. [2]
Support This Work
I work for YOU tirelessly day and night. If this reporting helps, help me keep my lights on so I can keep you informed.
Sources
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/01/18/trump-minnesota-insurrection-act/
https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/live-updates/minnesota-protests-ice-shooting-law-enforcement/
https://abcnews.go.com/US/live-updates/minneapolis-ice-shooting-live-updates/?id=129124338
https://www.factcheck.org/2026/01/the-threat-of-the-insurrection-act-in-minnesota/
It would have been so very easy for the (mal)administration to stop all this the day Renee Nicole Good was murdered. On that day they should have heeded the words of Mayor Frey and withdrawn ICE from Minneapolis. That would have been the end of it, for their thugs are the ones who generated the discord. But what's obvious to us is not to them, so events spiral irrationally out of control. And now Minnesota and the nation may suffer even more from their addiction to violence.
The Biden administration erased our National border and allowed 15,000,000 illegal immigrants into our country.
The reason? To increase Democratic seats in the US House through increased population in Democratic States.
Trump is simply reversing that illegal invasion. It’s lawful and necessary.
Walz, Frey and the NGO funded paid protests are trying to illegally stop or slow down the removal of illegal aliens.
The reasons why both sides are doing what they’re doing is just that simple.