ATH Intelligence Report | April 5, 2026
Tracking how extremist politics gets cleaned up for public life.
ATH Intelligence Report | April 5, 2026
Believing the strangest things. Calling it normal politics.
Introduction
The clearest new mainstreaming move in the last 48 hours is the Treasury Department and IRS announcing forthcoming guidance on the Johnson Amendment, the federal rule that bars tax-exempt churches and charities from endorsing or opposing political candidates. The new guidance would address how that rule applies to some communications made during religious services. [1][3]
That matters because it landed just days after a federal judge rejected a Trump administration settlement that would have let churches and other houses of worship endorse political candidates to their congregations without risking their tax-exempt status. The courtroom route stalled. The administrative route is now opening. [1][2]
This is how a major church-state boundary gets softened without a giant headline. Nobody has to announce a national religion. You just keep redefining political speech from the pulpit as protected internal religious communication until a line that once looked firm starts looking negotiable. [1][2][3]
TLDR
Treasury and the IRS said Friday they will develop new guidance on the Johnson Amendment for religious organizations, including how the law applies to some communications made during religious services. [1]
That announcement came after a federal judge rejected a settlement that would have allowed churches to endorse political candidates to their congregations without risking their tax-exempt status. Reuters reported that the National Religious Broadcasters, the Christian broadcasting association behind the case, plans to appeal. [2]
The immediate political significance is not subtle: a legal attempt to loosen the church-campaign boundary got blocked, and the administration is now signaling it may try to soften that boundary through guidance instead. [1][2]
Let me put the question the way Samuel L. Jackson, patron saint of the perfectly placed motherf***,* would put it: do these motherf***** ever take a day off? Because every time you turn around, here they come again. New press release. New sermon. New “civics” panel. Same hustle, different necktie. They do not take a day off. Which means I do not get to take a day off either. So if you want this daily watch to keep showing up while these people keep trying to sneak nonsense through the side door, at the very least, do not stroll past like this was complimentary bread at the table. Tip the waiter on your way out. Buy me a coffee.
What Moved Today
The move was administrative, not theatrical. Treasury said the forthcoming guidance will provide “clear, administrable standards” for houses of worship and explicitly mentioned communications made “within the context of religious services.” It also said Treasury and the IRS will engage with stakeholders before releasing the guidance later this year. [1]
That language matters because the Johnson Amendment is still on the books. The IRS says 501(c)(3) organizations, including churches, may not participate or intervene in political campaigns for or against candidates for public office. The question now is how much room the administration intends to carve out inside that existing rule. [1][3]
Who Got a Boost
The biggest boost went to the church-politicking lane of the religious right: the pastors, ministries, and advocacy groups that have long wanted wider legal cover to speak about candidates from the pulpit without tax risk. Reuters reported that the underlying lawsuit was brought by two Texas churches and the National Religious Broadcasters, an association of Christian broadcasters challenging the Johnson Amendment. [2]
The second boost went to the idea that this fight is not really about campaign intervention at all, but about religious liberty and internal church communication. That reframing is politically valuable because it makes an electoral-power question sound like a civil-liberties question. [1][2]
Who Made It Seem Normal
Treasury did. It framed the move as a matter of clarity, religious liberty, and First Amendment protection, not as a bid to loosen one of the remaining federal limits on tax-exempt campaign activity. The release even situated the announcement in the language of Holy Week, Passover, and faith in American public life. [1]
That is how this kind of shift gets cleaned up for public consumption. You do not say, “We are weakening the wall between church and campaign politics.” You say you are giving houses of worship sensible guidance that respects constitutional freedoms. [1][2]
Where It Showed Up
It showed up first in an official Treasury press release, then immediately in the wider legal and political context around the Johnson Amendment. Treasury said the new guidance will address communications tied to religious services. Reuters tied that move directly to the recently rejected settlement effort. [1][2]
It also showed up in the quieter but more important place: the boundary line between tax-exempt religious life and open electoral intervention. That line is not being erased outright. It is being tested, narrowed, and reinterpreted. [1][2][3]
What They Want
They appear to want a durable protected zone where candidate-adjacent speech inside houses of worship can be treated as ordinary religious communication rather than campaign intervention. That is the practical direction of both the rejected settlement and Treasury’s new guidance announcement. [1][2]
In plain English, they want pastors and religious organizations to have more room to talk electoral politics from inside tax-exempt institutions while avoiding the legal consequences that would apply to other nonprofits. [1][2][3]
Why It Matters
It matters because this is how a major church-state shift can happen without a dramatic headline or a Supreme Court blockbuster. The law stays on the books. The language around it changes. The enforcement assumptions soften. And before long, a limit that once looked real starts functioning like a suggestion. [1][2][3]
It also matters because churches are not just private clubs. They are tax-exempt institutions with money, audiences, trusted authority, and in many communities, deep emotional leverage. Expanding how openly candidate politics can operate inside those institutions changes electoral power, not just sermon content. [3]
What to Watch Next
Watch the actual text of the forthcoming guidance. The key question is how broadly Treasury and the IRS define communications “within the context of religious services.” [1]
Watch whether the IRS’s own public guidance on charities, churches, and politics gets revised to reflect a narrower reading of what counts as campaign intervention. [3]
Watch whether the National Religious Broadcasters appeal continues anyway. Reuters reported that the group planned to appeal the judge’s ruling, which means the legal route may keep running alongside the administrative one. [2]
And watch the Texas A&M civil-discourse lane this week. East Texas A&M’s April 7 symposium is officially framed as communication-skills and leadership training, while the best recent reporting says the wider system effort has leaned heavily on Republican speakers and drawn criticism that “civil discourse” is being used as a neutral wrapper for a partisan project. [4][5]
Closing
Today’s signal was not loud. It was cleaner than that.
A failed settlement gets followed by promised guidance. A hard rule gets softened through administrative language. A political fight gets repackaged as constitutional housekeeping. Different tone. Same drift. [1][2]
Help Keep This Watch Going
If you want this daily watch to keep showing up, do not act like a whole newsroom is out here doing this exact work for you. There is not. Then do the part people always swear they are about to do and become a paid subscriber.
Because if this is useful enough to read every day, it is useful enough to support every month. And if a full subscription is not in the cards, do not ease past the door like this was complimentary labor from the kindness of my heart.
Sources
Treasury and IRS announcement of forthcoming Johnson Amendment guidance for religious organizations — Treasury’s announcement of future guidance, including communications made within religious services.
Reuters on the judge’s rejection of the IRS settlement and the National Religious Broadcasters appeal — Legal context on the rejected settlement and planned appeal.
IRS background page on charities, churches, and politics — Current IRS explanation of what the Johnson Amendment prohibits.
East Texas A&M Civil Discourse Symposium page — Official April 7 symposium page and institutional framing.
Houston Chronicle on the Texas A&M system symposium series — Reporting on criticism that the civil-discourse branding masks a Republican-heavy lineup.
The solution is actually quite simple. Tax the churches. Remove them from the charitable donation category at the federal level. Then they can say whatever they want. I'm not sure if it's feasible. That would depend on the individual states. But it is simple.
Practicality of taxing churches…?