Blackout Brief 2-20-2026

Blackout Briefing

0:00

-11:43

Blackout Brief 2-20-2026

Front page facts. Blackout truths. What power wants you to forget by tomorrow.

Xplisset

Feb 21, 2026

I’m Xplisset, and this is Blackout News, a daily rundown of what happened today and what it means if you are not protected by the system. We hit the front page fast, then we go below the fold for the stories that land first on Black people and LGBTQ people, the ones mainstream outlets keep walking past.

If you want this in your feed every day, hit follow or subscribe on whatever app you’re using. And if you’ve been listening free and thinking about going paid, let me nudge you off the fence. I do this for a living. This is a one man operation right now, and I’m trying to scale it into a real media shop with deeper reporting and more hands on deck, so these stories do not die in the dark. I can’t keep doing that on free attention alone. If this show has been useful to you, go to xplisset dot com slash subscribe.

Support This Work You Know You Want To

Today’s emotional weather feels like a court ruling in one hand and a match in the other. The country is being governed by deadlines, punishment language, and the promise that somebody else will pay for it.

TLDR

Supreme Court blocks Trump’s sweeping global tariffs and draws a hard line on emergency powers.
Trump attacks the judges and signals a workaround.
Trump admits he is weighing “limited” strikes on Iran, while diplomacy keeps moving.
Blackout: voting restrictions by paperwork, a federal prison policy that cuts trans care, and a legal attack on binders that pushes kids toward unsafe alternatives.

FRONT PAGE

Let’s start with the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that Trump’s sweeping global tariffs were illegal under the emergency powers law he used to justify them. The core issue is power. The Court is saying you do not get to treat “emergency” like a blank check for a policy that hits the entire economy. Tariffs are taxes by another name, and the Constitution gives Congress the power to levy them. [1][2][3]

Here’s the receipt that matters for regular people. This is not just a law school argument. It raises real questions about refunds on money already collected, and what happens to prices if the policy whipsaws again. [1][2]

Now, the second story is the reaction, and it tells you as much as the ruling.

Trump did not just complain. In a White House press conference hours after the ruling, he called the justices who voted against him “a disgrace to our nation,” and said he was “absolutely ashamed” of them. He went personal, calling Barrett and Gorsuch “an embarrassment to their families,” and he said of the majority justices and the State of the Union: “I couldn’t care less if they come.” He also floated, without evidence, that the Court had been “swayed by foreign interests.” Then he pivoted to the workaround, announcing a new 10% global tariff under different legal authority. [4][5]

Watchpoint: which statute he actually uses, especially Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, and how long it can run. CBS notes that pathway is capped at up to 15% and no more than 150 days. Also watch whether Congress steps in, or whether this becomes the template: lose in court, switch authorities, then attack the referees. [2][4][5]

Third story, and this one is the kind that can rearrange working people’s lives quickly.

Trump said he is considering a limited military strike on Iran. That was his language, limited. At the same time, reporting says Iran is preparing a counterproposal, and officials describe ongoing diplomacy, even as military planning advances in the background. [6][7][8]

This is where “limited” is not a comfort word. “Limited” is a door. Once you walk through it, you are negotiating with escalation, retaliation, oil markets, and the reality that Congress gets treated like a suggestion. [6][7]

Watchpoint: listen for the language shift from “considering” to “authorization,” and watch the concrete moves, carrier posture, regional deployments, and what gets quietly briefed versus what gets performed at the cameras. [7][8]

Now let me stitch the front page together in one sentence.

The Supreme Court told Trump no on tariffs, and Trump answered by attacking the judges and searching for a workaround. Meanwhile, the Iran deadline talk keeps moving on a parallel track. Different issues, same governing instinct: punish, pressure, bypass.

BLACKOUT FILES

Alright. These are the stories that do not lead the nightly shows, but they change the ground beneath Black people, LGBTQ people, and everybody living close to the edge.

Blackout one is voting, and it is not abstract. It is paperwork as a weapon.

As Trump pushes voting restrictions, states are looking at a rarely used option to push back, because Republicans in Congress and the White House are trying to impose proof-of-citizenship requirements for voter registration. Here’s how that lands in real life: eligible people get blocked, especially when they do not have the right documents handy, or when database matches are sloppy, or when the process becomes a maze. For example, imagine a 70-year-old Black voter who has been registered for decades, but her driver’s license name does not perfectly match her birth certificate because of a marriage, a divorce, or a clerical error. She shows up, gets flagged, and now she is the one who has to take time off work, find paperwork, and prove she belongs on a roll she has been on her whole adult life. [9]

Who does this hit first: Black voters and communities that have historically been targeted by administrative voting barriers, plus naturalized citizens and poor and elderly voters who cannot easily produce paperwork on demand. The mechanism is simple. You do not have to say “I’m suppressing votes.” You just make registration harder, then call it integrity. [9]

Watchpoint: which states choose to resist, what legal theories they use, and how quickly local election offices get flooded with “prove it” demands that slow everything down. [9]

Blackout two is federal prisons, and it is aimed at transgender people who have the least visibility in the country.

The Marshall Project reports the Bureau of Prisons released a new policy on Thursday that would end gender-affirming medical and social transition care for almost any transgender person in federal custody. Under the policy, trans people would not have access to surgery, and they would lose clothing and toiletry items that align with their gender identity. People already on hormones would be forced onto tapering plans, with therapy and psychiatric medications positioned as the replacement. The reporting says the shift affects more than 1,000 people diagnosed with gender dysphoria in federal prisons, including hundreds currently receiving hormone therapy. [10]

Who it hits first: transgender people behind bars, who already face higher risks of violence and medical neglect, and who cannot simply switch providers when the government changes the rules. [10]

Watchpoint: whether courts block the policy, how the Bureau implements hormone tapering in practice, and whether any individualized medical assessments actually override the categorical bans. [10]

Blackout three is Texas, and it is a legal attack that pretends to be consumer protection.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced a lawsuit against a company that sells chest binders, claiming the products violate consumer protection laws. Put the politics to the side for a second and look at the consequence. If you scare companies out of selling safer binders, you do not end binding. You push kids toward unsafe binding with duct tape and bandages. That is how policy creates harm while claiming it is protecting children. [11]

Who it hits first: transgender youth, and anyone living in a house where being trans is already treated as a problem to be corrected rather than a person to be supported. [11]

Watchpoint: whether this spreads to other states, and whether the next targets are online retailers, shipping restrictions, or medical providers who give basic safety guidance. [11]

THE THREAD

Here’s the thread that ties this episode together.

The Supreme Court draws a boundary, and Trump attacks the judges and searches for a workaround. Meanwhile, the Iran talk keeps a deadline clock running. And down below the fold, you see the domestic version of that same clock: push people through paperwork, investigations, and fear until they comply without you ever having to win the argument.

SUPPORT AND RECEIPTS

If you want the receipts, links, and the full blackout list in one place, you have two paths. If you found this through Substack, it is right there with today’s post. If you did not, go to xplisset dot com and you will see it.

And I want to say this cleanly. I do this for a living. This is one person doing the reporting, writing, and publishing, trying to grow this into a full media operation with deeper reporting and staff, so these stories do not die in the dark. I cannot keep building that on free attention alone.

If this show has been useful to you, if it helped you make sense of the day, go paid. You are funding the next layer of reporting, and you are backing a person you can actually reach.

Indie Media You Can Actually Reach

CLOSE

Hope is not pretending the squeeze isn’t happening. Hope is building a habit of tracking receipts, not vibes. Track what courts do. Track what the administration does next, not what it says. Track what gets erased quietly while everybody is watching the big headline.

What are they asking you to forget by tomorrow.

This is Blackout News. Front page, blackout files, receipts only. See you tomorrow.