Shame Ended. Cruelty Found Sponsors.

How misogyny became the on-ramp for racist control

Guilty on “misogyny” spelling. I’ll fix it as soon as I get back to my editor, who just texted “bruh… really?”

You felt the shift. The joke got mean. She flinched. The room laughed. The chat threw fire emojis. The host smiled like a payday. That was the moment shame left the building.

Ten minutes later the edit hit your feed again, now with captions. “He cooked her.” “He said what men think.” The counter climbed. A brand DM’d. A booking followed. No boss called. No elder tugged a sleeve. Only the sound of a register.

By next week a school board held up a different clip and said, “See, this is the culture.” A cop slid it into a briefing. A prosecutor stapled lyrics to a case file. You watched private contempt turn into public fuel.

When the stage of shame broke, the market paid for cruelty.

If this hit your ribs and made you feel some kinda way, pull up.

Where tolerance was trained

Right after the Civil War, Southern law and custom treated the home as a “family government.” Husbands held authority inside it. When women reported beatings, threats, or abandonment, local courts often called it a private dispute. Clerks steered cases toward reconciliation or peace bonds. Fines were small and delays were long, which pushed many complainants to give up. Freedmen’s Bureau agents frequently told couples to “live together peaceably” rather than move cases into criminal court. The message landed: harm inside the door was not public business.

For Black women the risks were heavier. If they insisted on protection, sheriffs or magistrates could answer with charges like disorderly conduct, insulting behavior, or vagrancy. If court costs or fines went unpaid, jail or hire-out followed under convict leasing rules. The docket said the household was “restored.” The danger often remained.

Those habits carried into the Jim Crow decades. County judges and sheriffs kept rewording domestic cases as quarrels or breaches of the peace. Churches and neighborhood leaders taught the same lesson. Handle it at home. Speaking up marked a woman as troublesome. Local papers stayed quiet unless the case ended in a killing. Silence read as normal.

Mid-century media built a different kind of pressure in public. Three national TV networks, city papers, and major radio created a shared audience with clear standards. Sponsors and editors imposed visible penalties for on-air indecency, open bigotry, or public humiliation. If you crossed a line on that stage, phones rang and checks got pulled. Public misconduct faced consequences. Private harm still sat behind the label of family business.

That mix trained a culture. Ignore violence labeled private. Sanction transgression only when it appears on a common stage. Shame functioned as a public tool because audiences were shared. Where the shared audience ended, tolerance returned. This is the soil the platform era grows in.

Women go public, systems re-privatize (1865–1877)

Southern law and custom called the household a “family government.” Local magistrates and sheriffs treated most domestic assaults as private discipline, not public crime. That frame set the rules for what happened when women tried to use the state.

Freedwomen and poor white women went to justices of the peace, Bureau agents, or county courts to report beatings, threats, abandonment, or withholding of wages. They asked for warrants, separations, child support, or orders to keep the peace.

Clerks and magistrates often reclassified the complaint as a “quarrel,” “disturbing the peace,” or a “trifling” family matter. They urged reconciliation, bound both parties to keep the peace, or levied small fines on both. Bureau officers routinely told couples to return to their homes and “live together peaceably,” using advice and warnings rather than criminal process. When cases advanced, costs and delays fell hard on the complainant.

Black women faced racialized charges such as “disorderly conduct,” “insulting gestures,” or “vagrancy” when they protested or refused to reconcile. If they or their partners could not pay court costs or fines, sheriffs jailed them or hired them out under convict-leasing rules. The legal record branded the household “restored,” while the risk inside the house remained.

Churches, neighbors, and local papers mirrored the courts. “Family government” meant keep it in the house. Speaking up marked the woman as troublesome. Harm was real, but the system defined it as nonpublic.

Women brought private violence into public view. Courts and officials pushed it back behind the door. That routine trained communities to tolerate harm by labeling it “home business.” It is the muscle memory the culture carried forward.

From one stage to a thousand rooms (1948–2010s)

After Reconstruction, the “family government” habit stayed local. Mid-century brought a different lever in public life: a shared broadcast stage. From the late 1940s through the 1990s, three TV networks, major papers, and big radio set common boundaries. If you crossed a public line, sponsors and editors made you feel it. Private harm still got labeled “home business,” but public indecency met a common audience and a common cost.

In the 1990s and early 2000s, those seams started to split. Talk radio learned that outrage holds attention. Reality TV taught millions that humiliation is entertainment. Early internet forums gave people a mask and a megaphone. By the late 2000s, a phone camera and a free account turned anyone into a broadcaster. The shared stage fractured into countless rooms.

The 2010s locked it in. Feeds ranked what kept eyes on the screen. Creators learned to serve the room that paid them. Fans became a shield. Backlash became content. The old training survived inside a new machine: what used to be called “family business” now traveled as “content,” and the rooms that liked it removed the cost.

The Shamelessness Economy (2010s–present)

Here is the turn. Shame did not vanish. The stage did. Platforms sliced the old crowd into a thousand rooms. Each room sets its own rules. If your room laughs at cruelty, cruelty pays.

Audience capture does the training. You post. One bit hits. The room floods you with watch time, comments, superchats. You repeat the bit. You sharpen it. You raise the volume. The algorithm smiles because the graph went up. That is the contract. Keep them engaged. Everything else is scenery.

Gatekeepers used to pull the plug. Now the room does quality control, and the room likes spice. Parasocial protection kicks in. Fans defend the host like family. Critics become content. Backlash becomes a segment. Consequence turns into fuel.

Money tightens the loop. Ads pay for rage that holds attention. Memberships pay for access to the next takedown. Sponsors learn to look away if the numbers look good. A creator learns the oldest lesson in sales. Sell what moves. If disrespect moves, disrespect becomes the product.

Platforms are not courts. They count minutes, not harms. A clip that keeps people watching gets lifted. A channel that keeps people watching gets recommended. That math does not ask who got humiliated. It asks how long the viewer stayed.

So the rules flip. In the broadcast era, the same stage that made you famous could make you answer for crossing a line. In the platform era, you can pick a stage that never calls you to account. No shared stage. No shared shame.

This is how the house taught the timeline. We were trained to call harm “private.” Now rooms call it “content.” The effect is the same. The person who speaks up pays. The person who escalates gets booked. Cruelty becomes a business model and the audience becomes the alibi.

Three figures, one pipeline (2006–2022)

Same machine. Different faces. Watch how the room pays, then copies.

Sgt Willie Pete: the prototype

What it is. Early Black YouTube, grainy camera, long monologues. Product on the shelf: open contempt for Black women packaged as straight talk for “the fellas.”

Why it spread. No gatekeepers. Novelty shock. A crowd of frustrated men found a room that said, “Say it louder.” Pushback existed at first. Attention outlasted it. The clip economy learned a new trick: insult as intimacy.

Why it mattered. He set the tone for the Black manosphere. Once the audience paid for disrespect, copycats multiplied. The lesson traveled: if you can find a room that laughs, you can skip the mirror. Fans replaced juries.

Heartiste: the merger

What it is. Blog-era pickup artist meets white grievance. “Game” tips mixed with race science and winks at supremacy. He gave racism a gym membership and called it self-improvement.

Why it spread. Link economy plus outrage. Forums crossposted. Young men looking for a ladder got handed a club. The posts felt forbidden, which is another word for shareable.

Why it mattered. He welded misogyny to racial hierarchy and sold it as realism. Gender grievance became the on-ramp to harder politics. Now the pipeline had a spine: control women, defend tribe, punch down. Clicks replaced consequences.

Kevin Samuels: the mainstreaming

What it is. Studio-lit call-in show. Suit, pocket square, meter running. He put a suit on the insult and called it coaching. Viral “average at best” became a format, not a moment.

Why it spread. Algorithm plus appointment viewing. Superchats for sharper elbows. Clips that travel in every group chat. The room cheered the read-downs. The platform rewarded the room.

Why it mattered. Contempt for Black women went prime time. Bad-faith media could point and say, “authentic culture.” Inside the house, trust eroded. Outside the house, stereotypes hardened. The market proved the model: if humiliation holds attention, humiliation becomes the product.

The through-line

Prototype. Merger. Mainstream. Same contract. Serve the room that pays. Each step made it cheaper to disrespect women and easier to export that disrespect as proof against Black people as a whole. You can see the gears now: build a crowd on cruelty, teach the crowd to defend it, then watch outsiders use the clip to police you.

Fans replaced juries. You paid.

Kanye, clean and narrow (2007–present)

Kanye West is a Chicago rapper-producer who became one of the biggest pop stars of the 2000s and 2010s. Think Quincy Jones talent with tabloid gravity. Music, fashion, headlines. All of it.

In 2007 his mother, Donda, died after surgery. The grief was public. The guardrails came off. Two years later at the 2009 MTV awards he grabbed a mic from a young singer, Taylor Swift, to praise Beyoncé. On broadcast TV the crowd booed. He was scolded. That is the old stage. On the internet the clip went everywhere and paid everyone. That is the new market.

After that he learned what the feed rewards. Boundary breaks. Quick zingers that sting. In 2015 he took a shot at ex-partner Amber Rose with the “30 showers” line. In 2016 he released “Famous” with the line “I made that… famous” about Swift. Misogyny stopped being a slip and started looking like a format. The room laughed. The algorithm lifted. Repeat that enough times and contempt starts to feel like culture.

Then came the politics. In 2018 he put on a red hat, visited the White House, and sat on every couch that loves a culture war. Red-pill rooms clapped. Old fans hate-watched. Either way the meter ran. You do not need the whole country when ten rooms will pay for the clip.

By 2022 he crossed other lines with public antisemitic statements. Big brands cut ties. Platforms pulled levers. That shows mainstream shame still exists. But the niche economy kept offering mics. One door shuts. Twenty podcasts open. If a room funds escalation, escalation finds the room.

A superstar mapped the road many creators drive now. Break a boundary. Harvest the backlash. Sell the sequel. Along the way, gender contempt gets coded as “authentic,” exported as a picture of Black life, and then used against Black people in media and policy. The crowd becomes the court. The court likes the hit.

Antidotes and allies: Who resisted, what worked

Black feminist thinkers drew the map. bell hooks gave you a love ethic with teeth. Kimberlé Crenshaw handed you intersectionality so you could see more than one wound at a time. Tarana Burke turned whisper networks into Me Too before hashtags were a thing. dream hampton’s Surviving R. Kelly pulled a private open secret into public daylight. That is how shame works when the room is shared. You build a bigger room.

Plenty of Black men chose the hard lane. They passed on the cheap pop. They cut bits that got laughs for the wrong reason. They told younger creators, do not chase a clip that makes your daughter smaller. They lost fast money and slept fine. You may not know their names. You felt the temperature drop when they spoke.

Some hosts set rules and kept them. No humiliation for sport. No panels that treat women like props. Clear red lines read on air so the audience knows this is grown folks, not a food fight. When a guest crossed it, they dumped the segment and took the hit. Ratings wobble. Trust climbs.

Platforms sometimes blinked. A channel gets demonetized after they platformed open hate. A podcast loses sponsors when the receipts hit daylight. Is that perfect justice. No. Does it prove cost still works when a crowd shows up. Yes.

What actually works, every day, at human scale. Rooms that rehearse respect. Mods with power and a playbook. Hosts who say the rule out loud before the argument starts. A standing apology path that is short, specific, and public. The moment you make repair cheaper than denial, you change behavior.

Money rules matter. Refuse ad buys that prize cruelty metrics. Tell sponsors why. Tell your audience you did. Fund shows run by Black women and pay them market rate. Put women on the masthead with vote power on guests, topics, and edits. That is not optics. That is governance.

Clip rules matter. Do not post humiliation as promotion. Do not take the ugliest thirty seconds and build a brand off it. If a moment needs context to be fair, it needs context to be clipped. If you would not show it to your niece, it does not go out.

Audience rules matter. You are not a bystander. You are the algorithm. If you engage, it grows. Starve the rooms that feed on contempt. Feed the rooms that raise the cost. Share receipts, not just outrage. Praise a good boundary like you praise a good joke.

Here is the test for creators and hosts. Could the person you are debating walk out of your studio with dignity. If the answer is no, you sold someone a bruise and called it content. That is not grown. That is layaway for policy you will not like.

And yes, we honor the ones who kept the door open while the wind blew. Journalists who printed the names. Pastors and aunties who said, not in this house. Teachers who taught the boys to breathe and to listen. They did not trend. They did the work.

You want a blueprint? Build rooms where care converts. Put women in power on the team. Publish the rules. Enforce them on friends first. When you mess up, fix it fast and on camera. Make the apology worth watching. Make respect the flex.

If cruelty buys the mic, cruelty sets the law. So change who gets the mic.

Conclusion

We named the machine. We walked the rooms that pay for harm. We watched how the clip becomes a policy and how the bruise becomes a budget. That is the country we live in. Not for long if we choose different rooms.

Here is my personal vow. I will not sell humiliation as promotion. I will not book a guest who treats women like props. If a friend crosses the line, I cut the segment and say why. When money shows up for cruelty, I send it to repair. I will put do my damndest to put Black women in the seats that decide what goes on this platform. I will fix mistakes in public and fast.

Here is yours. Be the algorithm you want. Starve the rooms that live on contempt. Feed the ones that raise the cost. Share receipts, not just outrage. Praise a good boundary like you praise a good joke.

We can rebuild cost. We can make care convert. We can teach the next kid that respect is not corny. It is how you keep your people alive.

If you feel this too, join us. $80 a year keeps the lights on:

If $80 is too much for you right now then $8 a month can fit within your budget.

(Click all the way to the left)

We choose rooms that heal. We starve rooms that harm. If cruelty buys the mic, cruelty sets the law. So we change who gets the mic.