If It Was Your Kid
What if your kid’s school said she could leave only after you sign a “permission slip” so a cop follows her home and back. You’d say no, then call a lawyer, then call the news. Texas did that to a sitting lawmaker. On camera.
If you watched the video above, you saw Rep. Nicole Collier, a Democratic state lawmaker from Fort Worth, refuse to sign the “permission slip,” then sleep at her desk on the Texas House floor because her freedom came with conditions.
If you didn’t click the embed, here’s the source in plain English that journalist Roland S. Martin’s in his digital news program Roland Martin Unfiltered, streamed on YouTube.
In that video segment, Martin sets the scene and shows Collier on the floor, then says the quiet part plain: “They locked the doors.” (timestamp 00:28–00:32 in the video).
Collier spelled the scheme out: the Speaker said Democrats could leave only if they signed a permission slip “agreeing to be released into the custody of DPS… not just monitoring… in their custody… that sounds criminal. I’m not a criminal.” [Roland Martin Unfiltered, 02:24–02:41]
CNN confirmed the setup and sanded the edges. “Democratic lawmakers are back… Collier spent the night… refusing… 24/7 law enforcement escorts… this map appears to be on a glide path to passage.” [CNN, 00:00–00:41; 01:12–01:20]
Name what you saw. A condition for release. A forced tail. Locked doors. You don’t call a leash a necklace. It is still a leash.
Receipts On Tape
Here’s the part you can’t spin. The YT video.
Roland Martin opens with the scene you saw: “Texas State Rep. Nicole Collier… sleeping at her desk on the floor of the Texas House.” [Roland Martin Unfiltered, 00:05–00:11] Then the line that tells you everything: “They locked the doors.” [00:28–00:30]
Why the doors mattered: “Sign a permission slip that says that they will be accompanied by a Texas state trooper wherever they go.” [00:38–00:43] That is not a courtesy detail. That is a leash.
Collier names the condition out loud: “Those Democrats who broke quorum are free to leave this building if they sign a permission slip agreeing to be released into the custody of DPS. Not just monitoring but being in their custody. You know that sounds criminal. I’m not a criminal.” [02:22–02:41]
CNN confirms the mechanics and softens the stakes. “Representative Nicole Collier spent the night on the floor… She refused a Republican demand to have a state law enforcement officer escorted her around the clock in order to leave the Capitol grounds.” [CNN, 00:03–00:15] Then the horse-race gloss: “Republicans now appear to have a clear path to a redistricting plan that could bring them five more seats in Congress.” [00:37–00:41]
Their Capitol reporter spells out the constraint and the timeline: “This map appears to be on a glide path to passage.” [01:14–01:20] “An order that would require these House Democrats to have 24/7 law enforcement escorts if they are to leave the Capitol.” [01:32–01:41] “She has been on the House floor for nearly 21 hours… she won’t agree to that order.” [01:41–01:49]
Translation you can take to church: locked doors. Conditional release. A forced police tail. If you need a cop to shadow you to go home, you are not free. You are on parole.
How The Papers Wrote It
The New York Times gave you a scene report from Austin. By J. David Goodman. It has Rep. Nicole Collier, just back from a walkout and describing her choosing (I use that word very loosely here) sleeping on the House floor at the Texas State House chamber rather than sign a “permission slip.”
The piece stresses atmosphere and novelty. It notes that “officers had been assigned to keep track of members,” and quotes a Democrat saying, “I feel like it’s a personal security detail.” It describes leaders using a rules vote “to lock the chamber doors and prohibit members from leaving,” and recounts Collier being told she would be “trailed by an officer.” The cumulative effect is color and curiosity. It reads like a first-ever oddity.
The Washington Post wrote a power memo. Same who and where, same night. It prints the condition and the remedy in plain English. Collier “refused to sign paperwork that would allow police to follow her home,” and she “asked a judge to intervene, challenging the legality” of the order. The Post gives you the action verb and the legal counterpunch, then lets Collier speak for herself: “I’m not going to let them take away my voice.”
Mini read for you:
NYT leans mood words: “keep track,” “personal security detail,” doors locked under House rules.
WaPo leans power words: “sign paperwork,” “allow police to follow,” “asked a judge to intervene.”
Here is the Xplisset part you felt in your ribs. When the state says sign a slip so police follow you, that is not ambience. That is control. If your exit comes with a cop, your consent did not. If you need a signature to leave, you are bargaining for freedom you already own. Media said “escort.”
This was not prom night. It was conditions, written and enforced. It was surveillance with a smile. Name the hand on the key. Name the tail. Call the act.
Name The Act and The Motive
Name it plain. This was coercion of an elected official to force a vote under surveillance. Locked doors. Conditional release. A police tail as the price of freedom. That is not procedure. That is control.
Roland put a human face on the tactic. Rep. Sheryl Cole tried to take a morning walk. Her forced DPS “escort” escalated. “Threatened to arrest me… made a scene in front of my constituents.” [Roland Martin Unfiltered, 20:24–20:33] That is not safety. That is public intimidation.
Roland called the whole thing what it felt like. “This is like a hostage negotiation…” [Roland Martin Unfiltered, 19:12–19:16] You saw it. A signature dangled as a key. A cop assigned as your shadow. The message to every other member was clear. Sign and submit or stay locked in.
Here is your Xplisset line you can carry into any room.
They did not give her a bodyguard. They gave her a babysitter with cuffs.
Plain Speech vs Legal Speech
Call it what you saw. In plain speech, this reads as kidnapping. In the code, Texas carves it up narrower.
How Texas writes it
Unlawful restraint: restricting someone’s movement without consent by force, intimidation, or deception. Cuffs not required. A locked room or a “you can leave only if a cop shadows you” condition can qualify as restraint.
False imprisonment (civil): intentionally confining a person within boundaries they did not consent to, without lawful authority.
Kidnapping (criminal) in Texas requires abduction—restraint plus intent to prevent liberation, usually by hiding the person or using threatened deadly force. That’s the legal word the state will say you can’t use here.
What you watched
Locked doors.
A condition for release: sign a slip.
A forced police tail as the price of leaving.
As someone who wore the badge for twenty years, here’s the pocket test I used on the street:
If you cannot walk away without triggering a threat of arrest, you are detained.
If your “escort” is not voluntary and revocable, you are not being protected. You are in custody without cuffs.
If your freedom depends on a signature the state demands, your consent is not free. It is coerced.
The state’s likely defense
“House rules” and “member safety.” That is the claim of lawful authority. The legal fight is whether those rules justify custody outside the chamber and a police tail in the world beyond.
Why your word still matters
Law draws tight boxes. Democracy lives in common sense. You don’t need a statute book to recognize control.
When the government conditions your exit on accepting a cop in your shadow, that is restraint in practice. Say the hard word so history hears it. Carry this line with you: If ‘free’ comes with a chaperone, it isn’t free.
The press test — who named power, who massaged it
Here’s the 30-second test you can run on any story:
Name the actor with power. Who held the keys.
State the condition for release. In plain English.
Show body, time, choice. Who was confined, for how long, what choice was removed.
Name the stakes beyond Texas. Why this matters outside Austin.
Ban euphemism. Say locked doors. Say police tail. Say custody.
Roland Martin Unfiltered — Pass.
Named the lock. Named the slip. Named the tail. Put Collier on camera saying “custody.” Brought receipts on Rep. Cheryl Cole’s harassment during her walk. Called the tactic what it felt like. Hostage logic in a House chamber. You got facts and spine.
Washington Post — Pass.
Printed the condition and the remedy. “Sign paperwork that allows police to follow.” “Asked a judge to intervene.” Named who gave the order. This reads like power, not weather.
CNN — Needs revision.
Confirmed the facts. Softened the stakes with “glide path to passage.” That’s horse-race talk during a custody fight. Fix it. Write the condition in the first sentence. “Leaders locked the chamber. Leaving required a police tail.”
New York Times — Needs revision.
Strong scene. Weak verbs. “Keep track.” “Personal security detail.” Color instead of custody. Fix it. Lead with the lock. Then write the leash. “Members could leave only if they signed a slip allowing police to follow them.”
Run this test every time. If a piece cannot name the hand on the key or the condition to walk out the door, it is not reporting power. It is reporting vibes.
Here’s your Xplisset gut check. If the story reads like a chaperone, but the tape looks like a tail, believe the tape.
Say It So History Hears You
Here is the vow. We will not train our mouths to whisper while the state trains cops to tail you home. We stop calling coercion a quirk. We stop calling custody an escort. We stop calling a locked door a “procedural pause.”
History cares about verbs. Locked. Ordered. Followed. Threatened. If the verbs are soft, the memory is fake. Your kids will read that fake memory and think freedom comes with a chaperone. Not on our watch.
Name the act. Name the actor. Demand the remedy. Repeat. That is the job. Not the hobby. Citizen energy is gasoline. A real press is the engine. You deserve both working at once.
They are betting on your fatigue. We are betting on your memory. Hold the picture in your head: a lawmaker bargaining for the right to walk out the door without a cop in her shadow. Hold it, then speak it.
Say the hard word now so the record does not lie later. Say kidnapping when they script “escort.” Say custody when they script “keep track.” Say restraint when they script “security.”
Carry this with you: the state wants quiet. Democracy wants volume. We choose volume. We choose precision. We choose receipts.
If this landed deep inside your soul, help me keep saying the hard word while they script the soft one.
This campaign closes today at 12:00 pm ET. I am at 3 of 20 annuals. Zero Honorary Editors so far.
Annuals — $80. Be one of the 20 who keep this voice loud when the state wants quiet.
Honorary Editor — $250. You get the perks if you want them. What you really get is to say you were early.
Perks
Founders-only Zoom session. First eyes on major drops before they go live. A free copy of my first book when it hits.
Rather test the work first. Take a free 7-day trial. See the receipts. Then decide.
If this serves you, pull up with us. If you already know, become a paid subscriber today.
Founders link: https://xplisset.substack.com/subscribe?checkout=founding
I think the only white person they've fucked with is the judge in WI.
The only reason I go to TX, Houston, actually, is that my niece lives there and we go to opera. BUT, she is in transit to Wisconsin, which is only marginally better, but she will bring her blue dot with her.
Meantime, these are not real Texans, the ones we've been taught are the Lone Star State, the proud, hardy survivors of everything TX threw at them. Nope. Now they are wimpering cowards bullying principled Black Women state legislators and threatening to arrest them and charge them with nonexistent felonies. It's always (white) men bullying (Black) women and they feel not even a shred of shame at the viciousness of their acts.
Is this TEXAS? Or are they beholden to Putin and his toady Trump? Of course, they are traitors and TEXAS must be ashamed of them. Tell them how ashamed of them you are.
Nicole Collier is the only hero (and those who stand by her) of this debacle .
Shame on Texas for caving to the Russians.