Before we get into the charts, a quick heartbeat check. To everyone who already moved, thank you because you’ve carried XVOA from 67 paid readers all the way to 82, putting us just a few yards short of that 100-paid “bestseller” mark. That little “bestseller” check mark tells Substack’s system to boost this work in front of thousands of new readers who would almost never find XVOA on their own.
If you’re still reading for free and feeling that little tug in your chest, this is the moment to lean in. Shifting to paid now is what turns this from a niche side-project into a signal loud enough to cut through the national noise.
Trump Meets Mamdani: Media Splits on Unlikely White House Truce
President Donald Trump’s surprisingly cordial meeting with New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani has generated starkly different coverage across the ideological spectrum . Liberal outlets expressed amazement at the warm tone after months of insults, centrist sources relayed the cooperative messaging matter-of-factly, and conservative media largely portrayed Trump’s magnanimity – even as some on the right seized on the socialist mayor-elect’s past positions.
What Each Side Emphasized
Liberal outlets stressed the unexpected alliance and irony of the Oval Office scene. The Guardian noted Trump’s praise for a man he’d branded a “communist lunatic,” highlighting the “surprisingly cordial” atmosphere and Trump’s promise to help his “ideological opposite” . The emphasis was on how sharply this meeting deviated from prior animosity. Essentially, Trump meeting Mamdani was “nice” despite all expectations . Coverage also pointed out Republican attacks on Mamdani (like being called a “jihadist”) to underscore the meeting’s improbability . Some liberal commentary injected skepticism and humor: The Daily Beast facetiously dubbed the meeting a “love-fest” and noted Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade was “gobsmacked” by Trump’s friendliness . This side of the media often framed Trump’s outreach as a political spectacle and implying it’s “easy to win [Trump] over in the moment” as one Democratic strategist told the Examiner while marveling at the genuine policy common ground on housing and affordability.
Centrist outlets delivered a straight account of the meeting, focusing on the cordial tone and shared goals. The narrative in AP and NPR pieces was that after bitter exchanges, the two politicians “agreed on a lot” and pledged to work together on issues like lowering living costs and crime . The Associated Press (via NDTV) story, for example, led with the image of former “worst nightmare” adversaries turned warm partners working for New Yorkers . Details like Trump’s “We’re going to be helping him” vow and Mamdani’s focus on affordability appeared in straightforward succession . These outlets typically quoted Trump calling Mamdani a “very rational person” and Mamdani acknowledging “many disagreements” but a “shared purpose” in serving the city . The emphasis was factual: two populist politicians from opposite ends finding overlap on practical issues. Little subjective language was used. For instance, ABC News simply described the meeting as “cordial” and “productive,” noting both men’s comments about helping New York and largely leaving it at that .
Conservative outlets largely hailed Trump’s conciliatory move while subtly reminding audiences of Mamdani’s far-left ideology. Fox News framed the encounter as an Oval Office “love fest” where Trump “found unity” with the “socialist” mayor-elect on making New York safe and affordable . Fox’s coverage highlighted Trump’s congratulations to Mamdani for running “an incredible race” and his remark that party labels didn’t matter in this effort . The underlying message was Trump’s openness and statesmanship. He was “cheering for” a one-time adversary to succeed . At the same time, right-leaning outlets pointed out Mamdani’s labels: Fox mentioned the White House press secretary calling Mamdani a “communist” prior to the meeting , and Breitbart and Daily Caller zeroed in on moments like Trump jokingly telling Mamdani to “just say yes” to calling him a fascist and portraying Trump as in control of the room’s tenor. Notably, Washington Examiner and others presented the meeting as savvy for Trump, quoting Trump allies who see Mamdani as a useful foil turned temporary friend . Overall, the right’s narrative was that Trump’s charm won the day, even as they slipped in reminders of Mamdani’s “out there” socialist ideas and past clashes (Fox, for instance, appended a note that Mamdani has been “accused of holding antisemitic views” ).
Figure 1: Ideology scores for selected outlets, from most liberal (left) to most conservative (right). Lower (negative) scores indicate a more liberal slant, higher (positive) scores a more conservative slant
Where They Overlap
Across the spectrum, there was agreement that the meeting was unexpectedly amicable and newsworthy for that reason. Almost all outlets from liberal, center, and conservative noted Trump’s striking public praise for Mamdani and his pledge to support the new mayor. Descriptions like “warm and friendly” (AP ), “cordial” (ABC ) and “remarkably respectful” (Examiner ) appeared in many reports, indicating consensus that this was a departure from politics as usual. The key sound bites were widely reported: Trump saying “we agreed on a lot more than I would have thought” , and Mamdani calling the talk “productive” and focused on shared love for New York . Notably, the same lighthearted exchange made headlines across ideologies. When a reporter pressed Mamdani on calling Trump a fascist, Trump cut in with “That’s OK, you can just say yes”, diffusing the moment. Left, center, and right outlets alike mentioned this quip (though their tone in retelling it differed) because it so neatly captured the meeting’s surprisingly genial vibe. All sides also reported that both men talked extensively about fighting high living costs and signaling that, rhetoric aside, the policy overlap on affordability was a central takeaway .
Domestic vs. Foreign Coverage
Domestic U.S. coverage tended to stick to the political implications for American audiences, whereas foreign outlets often zoomed out for context or candor. For example, U.S. networks like ABC and NPR matter-of-factly recapped the meeting and its significance for New York, largely avoiding dramatic language. In contrast, The Guardian (UK) and ABC News Australia used slightly wryer tones: the Guardian opened with “It’s not as if they were holding hands and skipping down the halls”, an arch reminder of lingering tensions even amid the truce . Foreign outlets also felt freer to explicitly label Mamdani as a “democratic socialist” and frame the event as a broader populist phenomenon, whereas U.S. outlets often just noted his party affiliation in passing.
Al Jazeera, looking at it from a global perspective, contextualized Mamdani’s stance on issues like Palestine and even highlighting that during the press conference Mamdani reiterated his criticism of the US government’s role in “Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza”, a striking moment largely absent from U.S. coverage . This suggests foreign media were attuned to angles that American outlets (left and right) downplayed, such as international policy rifts.
Overall, domestic coverage homed in on the meeting’s impact on U.S. politics from New York City to Trump’s image while foreign coverage often marveled at the spectacle and what it says about American democracy. Notably, both domestic and foreign reports conveyed Trump’s message that he “loves New York” and will help Mamdani succeed , signaling that despite differing angles, the core development , an unlikely détente, was recognized worldwide.
Figure 2: Bias index for selected outlets, from lowest bias (most neutral) to highest. Calculated from loaded language, opinion cues, and sourcing density (lower is more neutral).
What’s Missing or Underplayed
Skepticism about motives: Few outlets probed why Trump extended this olive branch. Most took his warm words at face value; only some analysis (e.g. Examiner) hinted it might be a tactical “ceasefire” ahead of elections .
Mamdani’s base reaction: There was little discussion of how progressive supporters perceive Mamdani meeting cordially with Trump. The potential backlash or pressure on Mamdani from his left flank was largely absent.
Policy specifics: Coverage focused on broad themes (affordability, crime) but gave scant detail on what Trump and Mamdani might actually do together. The press conference optics overshadowed questions about concrete policy collaboration or federal support beyond words.
Continued GOP hostility: Aside from mentioning a few GOP insults, outlets didn’t dwell on whether Republican hardliners will accept Trump’s friendly stance. For instance, Trump’s own party in New York calling Mamdani “a jihadist” got brief note but not deeper exploration of intra-GOP debate.
Historical precedent: The coverage seldom mentioned how unusual (or not) such a meeting is. References to previous presidents clashing or cooperating with big-city mayors were missing, which could have given readers context for how extraordinary this moment was.
Why This Fits Past Patterns
This media split follows a familiar pattern: each segment of the press filtered the event through its ideological lens. Liberal media often spotlight Trump’s controversies and ironies but here, the irony of him embracing a socialist he once vilified is consistent with their skepticism of Trump’s sincerity. Conservative outlets, true to form, highlighted Trump’s leadership and humor, much as they have downplayed negative storylines and accentuated his “wins” in the past. The center/straight news sources maintained their descriptive, both-sides approach, just as one would expect from AP, NPR or network news. In that sense, the coverage of “Trump meets Mamdani” is a microcosm of how U.S. media has long covered Trump-involved incidents: with stark divergence on tone and focal points but overlapping factual core. We also see the pattern of partisan outlets using the same event to advance their narratives with conservatives using it to soften Trump’s image or knock “radical socialism,” and liberals using it to question Republican consistency (or poke fun at right-wing media’s discomfort ). Each side’s treatment aligns with how they’ve reacted to Trump’s unexpected moves before being divided by bias, yet all recognizing a headline-grabbing moment.
What to Watch Next
Trump’s next moves: Will this cordial tone last? Media will be watching if Trump keeps cooperating with Mamdani (e.g. restoring funds, avoiding attacks) or reverts to name-calling when politically expedient.
Mamdani’s performance: If Mamdani’s progressive policies falter or succeed, expect conservative outlets to say “we told you so” or liberals to claim vindication. His mayoralty could become a proxy battle in national media narratives.
Political fallout: As 2026 midterms near, will Republicans continue elevating Mamdani as a socialist bogeyman (as hinted by some GOP quotes )? Conversely, will Democrats embrace or distance themselves from this odd Trump-Mamdani détente? Media coverage will amplify these strategic choices.
Methods & Caveats
This analysis sampled one recent article from 12 outlets (4 liberal, 4 center, 4 right) within 24 hours of the meeting. We prioritized straight news pieces (except one opinion example) to compare framing. Bias scores were estimated based on each article’s language (loaded adjectives, subjective tone) and sourcing density, using a simple formula – they are approximate indicators, not scientific measures. All sources are linked for transparency. Keep in mind that an outlet’s overall slant may not be fully captured in a single article, and story tone can vary by reporter. Nonetheless, these snapshots offer a window into how different corners of the press interpreted the same political theater in real time.
The only reason you’re reading a deeper cut like this is because a small group of you decided work like this shouldn’t be background noise. Right now it’s about 82 paid readers carrying this whole operation on their backs, and if we can push that to 100 paid subscribers before year’s end, Substack tags XVOA as a “bestseller” and shoves this kind of media autopsy in front of people who will never go looking for a retired cop’s newsletter on their own. If this piece helped you see the coverage differently, I’m asking you, not “people like you,” no, you to move from free to paid today and help me keep cutting through the spin. Upgrade here:
Sources:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/11/21/trump-mamdani-oval-office/
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/nov/21/donald-trump-zohran-mamdani-meeting
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/11/22/great-meeting-key-takeaways-from-trump-mamdani-white-house-meeting
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-anchor-brian-kilmeade-gobsmacked-by-donald-trumps-mamdani-meeting/
https://www.iowapublicradio.org/news-from-npr/2025-11-21/trump-and-mamdani-share-a-cordial-white-house-meeting-after-months-of-trading-attacks
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/adversaries-to-allies-changing-trump-mamdani-bond-post-white-house-meet-9680353
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-mamdani-meet-oval-office-mayor-elect-pushes/story?id=127715736
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-22/zohran-mamdani-donald-trump-meet-white-house/106040052
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-reveals-one-thing-common-he-has-mamdani-after-oval-office-love-fest
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/3893452/trump-trades-attacks-praise-mamdani-oval-office-meeting/
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/11/21/trump-lets-mamdani-answer-is-he-leader-of-democrats-mayor-elect-says-focused-on-new-york-city/
https://dailycaller.com/2025/11/21/trump-mamdani-fascist-oval-office-meeting/
Another excellent piece, X. I particularly liked the section on what to watch for next. Let's see what actually happens before passing judgement on the meeting. Will Trump stop his opposition to anything that might benefit NYC? It's possible; his attention span is not that long. Maybe a kind of "benign neglect" (to drag up an unhappy phrase from the past). His flying monkeys may have other ideas.
I don't think this truce, if truce it is, will have much effect on national politics. This is a New York thing. MAGAts gonna MAGAt, zealots gonna whine, but most people will just carry on as before.
And your references to foreign perceptions of this event are important, not so much for the perceptions themselves as for our own need to be aware of them.
Color me suspicious / cynical / bewildered ... in equal measure. This feels like a set-up -- & a serious misstep for Mamdani. (But then, nobody asked me!!) We'll see what happens. Let's hope Mamdani sees this for the ruse it is. Trusting Trump is a fool's move.