This kind of analysis is why l subscribe. It provides a different, important perspective on things you may hear about and think you understand, only to have that illusion shattered.
Two minor observations: sometimes the paperwork is just the paperwork, the thing that allows the system to work. But what’s important is to find out who devised the rules. What were their implicit assumptions? Who benefits?
And pursuant to that last question, apply it to the charade(s) of negotiations concerning the Iran war. Who benefits from the prolonged twists and turns as reported in the MSM? It’s always useful to follow the monet.
This kind of analysis is why l subscribe. It provides a different, important perspective on things you may hear about and think you understand, only to have that illusion shattered.
Two minor observations: sometimes the paperwork is just the paperwork, the thing that allows the system to work. But what’s important is to find out who devised the rules. What were their implicit assumptions? Who benefits?
And pursuant to that last question, apply it to the charade(s) of negotiations concerning the Iran war. Who benefits from the prolonged twists and turns as reported in the MSM? It’s always useful to follow the monet.